So I have a debate coming up for my AP Language class and my teacher is forcing me to support a topic I am strongly against. My teacher is a very clever man and this is graded so I can't just half ass it and hope it comes out okay. I was hoping maybe you guys could give me some decent talking points on the subject. The topic that phones should be subsidized for all people on financial aid in the United States and they should be allowed to upgrade these phones for better phones such as iPhones androids and shit like that. If you're wondering why I don't agree allow me to explain. While I do agree that we should subsidize phones for Americans on welfare for emergency reasons and maybe a few recreational uses I don't agree with people on welfare bring allowed to upgrade these phones for things like iPhones. I'm not ashamed to say that I myself am pretty poor, however I payed full price for my iPhone and whenever I find that I can't afford it I deactivate it and switch to my prepaid phone which I pay for without help. Not to mention that this extension of this bill, which is what allows for these upgrades, costs the United States approximately 2.5 billion dollars a year. I'm sum urge I could come up with more arguments against it but right now I'm looking for arguments FOR it, so if anyone could help that's be great. Please make sure that you're arguments supporting this are LOGICAL. I can think of a shit ton of uneducated things to say in support if this trash by myself, thank you.